Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ZEISS IKON, serial 76510427, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ZEISS IKONSerial 76510427 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: CARL ZEISS AG
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed Apr 29, 2003
Registered Nov 09, 2004
The record shows that ZEISS IKON is a cancelled Principal Register mark owned by CARL ZEISS AG, with the cancellation entered on May 23 2025 because the registrant failed to file an acceptable Section 8 declaration; no later activity appears. The registration covered only Class 009 goods—photographic cameras, film cameras, video cameras, video tape recorders, digital video recorders, photographic projectors, camera objectives, camera filters, attachment lenses and shutters for photography—so a similar name used on those types of equipment would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside that narrow scientific‑apparatus field are farther from the scope shown. Because the mark is on the Principal Register, the record does not give the owner control over every use of the words “ZEISS IKON” in any context. The prosecution history shows routine post‑registration maintenance (Section 8 filings in 2010 and 2014) but no oppositions, cancellations beyond the Section 8 lapse, or other enforcement signals. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to brand photographic or video equipment with a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.