Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for LOVE FLOWERS, serial 76533385, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
LOVE FLOWERSSerial 76533385 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: FLAT CREEK MOUNTAIN, INC.
Class 027 -
Filed Jul 17, 2003
The record shows that “LOVE FLOWERS” is a dead application that was abandoned on June 16 2007 because the owner never filed a Statement of Use after the Notice of Allowance, and the owner listed is Flat Creek Mountain, Inc., a corporation organized in North Carolina. The filing covered only goods in International Class 027 – a long list of floor‑covering items such as bath mats, carpet tiles, rubber mats, vinyl floor coverings and similar products – so a later user of “Love Flowers” for those kinds of floor or wall coverings would run into the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give Flat Creek Mountain any control over every possible use of the words “love” or “flowers,” especially in unrelated industries. This was a Principal Register filing, not a Supplemental Register entry, and the prosecution history simply shows the usual extensions for a Statement of Use that were never satisfied before the abandonment. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice mailed in December 2007, and the supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations or court actions. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan to market floor‑covering products under a similar name, but the risk is far lower for unrelated goods.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.