Status report

Get it in writing

The official USPTO status record for STICK-IT, serial 76580285, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.

INSTANT DELIVERY

Trademark Status Report

$7.99

The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.

  • Current status with a plain-English verdict
  • Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
  • The mark as it appears on the federal record
  • Every prosecution event, filing to today
  • Source-cited with the exact retrieval date

Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.

Payments launch soon. Leave your email and we'll tell you when this report is available.

Searching stays free, no account, no caps.

Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
STICK-IT
Serial 76580285 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled

Owner: COMPLEMENTARY COATINGS CORP.
Class 002 -
Filed Mar 10, 2004
Registered Mar 15, 2005

The record shows that the mark “STICK‑IT” is no longer active; it was cancelled on October 16, 2015 because the registrant, Complementary Coatings Corp., did not file a Section 8 declaration. The mark had been registered on the Principal Register in 2005 for the specific goods of primer and sealer coatings used on interior drywall before wallpaper. A similar name would raise the closest concern if used for products or services that involve interior wall preparation or similar coatings, because that is the exact scope listed. The cancellation does not mean the wording is free for all uses; it only removes the federal protection for that particular class of goods. The prosecution history shows a straightforward registration and later cancellation, with no opposition or court actions recorded. Since no enforcement activity appears in the supplied history, there is no visible signal of the owner actively protecting the mark. For someone thinking of a similar name, the risk is that using it for drywall primers or related coatings could still be problematic, while other unrelated uses would be farther from the recorded concern.

Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.

The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.

Your name deserves a straight answer.

Search the federal register free. No account, no caps, no waiting around.

Run a free trademark search