Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for CRAZY HEADS, serial 76582340, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
CRAZY HEADSSerial 76582340 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Barrett, Michael
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 014 -
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 018 -
Class 021 -
Class 024 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 028 -
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Mar 22, 2004
The record shows that the mark “CRAZY HEADS” is dead, having been abandoned because the owner, Michael Barrett, failed to file a Statement of Use or an Extension Request after the Notice of Allowance was issued on January 24, 2006. The abandoned application covered a wide range of goods, including cosmetics and cleaning products, various children’s entertainment media such as CDs, DVDs, and audio recordings, clocks and watches, paper goods, a broad array of clothing items, bags and luggage, plastic kitchenware, bedding and towels, and a large assortment of children’s toys and play equipment. Because the abandoned mark listed these specific goods, a new mark that is very similar and used for any of these items would raise the closest record‑based concern. The record does not grant control over every use of the wording; it only shows that the abandoned application once sought protection for those particular goods. The prosecution history shows that the examiner initially approved the mark for publication in the Principal Register, but the applicant withdrew the allowance before publication, and the mark was ultimately abandoned. No opposition, cancellation, or court action appears in the supplied history, so the record shows no visible enforcement activity. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status means the mark is no longer enforceable, but the extensive list of goods in the original application suggests that a new mark used for similar products could still face a meaningful concern.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.