Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for OPENWIDE.TV, serial 76597649, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
OPENWIDE.TVSerial 76597649 · Principal Register
Dead · Withdrawn
Owner: SHARP KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Class 011 -
Filed Jun 16, 2004
The record shows that the mark OPENWIDE.TV was abandoned on August 10, 2004 after the applicant filed an express abandonment, so it is not live, registered, pending or cancelled; the owner listed is SHARP KABUSHIKI KAISHA, a corporation organized in Japan. The only goods covered are “liquid crystal display television receivers and television receivers” in International Class 011, meaning the closest area of concern would be any other brand using OPENWIDE for TV hardware or similar display equipment. The record does not give SHARP control over every possible use of the word OPENWIDE, especially in unrelated product categories. Because the registration was on the Principal Register and never moved to the Supplemental Register, there is no examination sequence to explain. The latest meaningful event is the express abandonment on August 10, 2004, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a modest concern if you plan a TV‑related brand, but the risk drops sharply for unrelated goods or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.