Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for QUARRY POINT PARTNERS, serial 76616562, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
QUARRY POINT PARTNERSSerial 76616562 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Quarry Point Partners, LLC
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Filed Oct 19, 2004
The record shows that “QUARRY POINT PARTNERS” is an abandoned service mark – the application was filed by Quarry Point Partners, LLC, a limited‑liability company organized in Illinois, but it was abandoned on January 4 2007 after the owner failed to file a required Statement of Use following the Notice of Allowance; the latest meaningful event in the file is the abandonment notice mailed on March 13 2007. The only goods listed are “financial services, namely, providing consultation in the field of investments for hedge funds, investable hedge fund indices and structured financial products” in International Class 036, so a similar name used in that same financial‑consulting arena would present the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Quarry Point Partners” outside that narrow financial‑services description. No supplemental‑register filing appears, and the prosecution history simply tracks the standard allowance and the later failure to submit use evidence. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations or court actions, so there is no visible enforcement signal. I'd treat this as a modest concern if you plan to offer comparable hedge‑fund consulting services under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.