Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for GOODZ'N'THAHOOD, serial 76625174, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
GOODZ'N'THAHOODSerial 76625174 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: NORVILLE, ERIK TODD
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Dec 20, 2004
Registered Nov 27, 2007
The record shows that GOODZ'N'THAHOOD is no longer active – it was cancelled on July 4 2014 because the registrant did not file a required Section 8 declaration, and the owner listed is Erik Todd Norville, an individual. The registration covered two classes: Class 025 for a broad range of clothing items such as pants, jackets, T‑shirts, caps, footwear and outerwear, and Class 041 for entertainment services including motion‑picture film production and music production. A similar name used in clothing or film‑/music production would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside those categories fall farther from the scope shown here. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “GOODZ” or “THAHOOD.” This was a Principal Register registration, not a Supplemental Register filing, and the prosecution history reflects a normal examination that ultimately led to registration in 2007 before the later cancellation. The supplied history contains no opposition, cancellation proceeding or other enforcement activity. I'd treat the cancellation as a meaningful signal that the mark no longer blocks new users in the listed areas, but the prior coverage of apparel and entertainment still suggests a moderate risk if you plan a similar name in those fields.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.