Status report

Get it in writing

The official USPTO status record for PORQUE USTED TIENE COSAS MEJORES QUE HACER., serial 76648059, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.

INSTANT DELIVERY

Trademark Status Report

$7.99

The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.

  • Current status with a plain-English verdict
  • Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
  • The mark as it appears on the federal record
  • Every prosecution event, filing to today
  • Source-cited with the exact retrieval date

Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.

Payments launch soon. Leave your email and we'll tell you when this report is available.

Searching stays free, no account, no caps.

Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PORQUE USTED TIENE COSAS MEJORES QUE HACER.
Serial 76648059 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled

Owner: ACC CAPITAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Filed Oct 06, 2005
Registered May 01, 2007

The record shows the mark “PORQUE USTED TIENE COSAS MEJORES QUE HACER.” was registered on the Principal Register to ACC CAPITAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, but the registration was cancelled on Dec 6 2013 because the owner failed to file an acceptable Section 8 declaration, so the mark is now dead. The registration covered only Class 036 services – mortgage lending and financial services, including loan processing, collections, brokerage, banking, escrow account maintenance and related online mortgage banking activities. A similar phrase used in any of those financial contexts would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside that narrow scope are farther from the listed area but still not automatically free of risk. The prosecution history shows the mark moved through normal examination, was approved for publication, and ultimately registered, with no oppositions or cancellations noted before the Section 8 failure. Since the supplied history contains no enforcement actions, there’s no visible signal of aggressive policing. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use the phrase for financial services, but the risk is lower for unrelated goods.

Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.

The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.

Your name deserves a straight answer.

Search the federal register free. No account, no caps, no waiting around.

Run a free trademark search