Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for BANDAI NAMCO, serial 76652320, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
BANDAI NAMCOSerial 76652320 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: KABUSHIKI KAISHA BANDAI NAMCO HOLDINGS
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 010 -
Class 011 -
Class 012 -
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 020 -
Class 021 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 028 -
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Dec 22, 2005
Registered Jan 27, 2009
The record shows that “BANDAI NAMCO” is a live Principal Register trademark owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA BANDAI NAMCO HOLDINGS, with the registration renewed on Feb 28 2019. The filing covers a wide range of goods and services, most notably electronic devices such as cellular phones, cameras, ear plugs and downloadable programs (Class 009); stand‑alone video‑game machines and handheld gaming units (Class 028); and education‑ and entertainment‑related services including lotteries, seminars, exhibitions and online magazines (Class 041). A similar name would raise the closest record‑based concern if used for products or services that fall within those categories, especially electronics, gaming hardware, or related entertainment offerings. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “BANDAI NAMCO.” No Supplemental Register filing appears, and the prosecution history simply reflects the normal allowance and registration steps. The supplied history contains no visible enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern for anyone planning a comparable mark in the same tech‑gaming or entertainment fields.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.