Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for BABSON CAPITAL, serial 76660144, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
BABSON CAPITALSerial 76660144 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: BARINGS LLC
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Filed May 17, 2006
Registered May 27, 2008
The record shows that BABSON CAPITAL is a live Principal Register service mark owned by BARINGS LLC, a Delaware limited‑liability company, and it has been renewed as of Nov 28, 2018. The registration covers financial services in International Class 036, specifically advice relating to investments and commodities, real‑estate appraisal and management, options and swaps, brokerage of securities, capital‑investment consultation, cash‑management, commercial lending, credit‑risk management, equipment financing, equity‑capital investment, credit‑worthiness evaluation, financing of real estate, financial analysis, due‑diligence and related consulting. A similar name used for any of those financial‑service activities would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside that scope would be farther from the listed coverage but are not automatically free of risk. The prosecution history shows a standard examination with an office‑action and final refusal in May 2007 that was overcome, leading to registration on the Principal Register; there is no supplemental‑register step. The most recent meaningful event is the 2018 Section 8/9 renewal, and the supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to offer comparable financial services under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.