Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for I'M A KING'S KID I REIGN DEUTERONOMY 15:6 FOR THE LORD THY GOD BLESSETH THEE, AS HE PROMISED THEE: AND THOU SHALT REIGN OVER MANY NATIONS, BUT THEY SHALL NOT REING OVER THEE I RULE DANIEL 7:18 BUT THE SAINTS OF THE MOST HIGH SHALL TAKE THE KINGDOM, AND POSSESS THE KINGDOM FOREVER, EVEN FOREVER AND EVER I DONONATE MATTHEW 11:12 AND FROM THE DAYS OF JOHN THE BAPTIST UNTIL NOW THE KINGDON OF HEAVEN SUFFERETH VIOLENCE, AND THE VIOLENT TAKE IT BY FORCE, serial 76681907, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
Trademark Status Report
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Serial 76681907 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: SMITH, ELVIRA
Class 025 - Clothing
Filed Sep 17, 2007
The record shows the application for “I’M A KING’S KID I REIGN DEUTERONOMY 15:6 FOR THE LORD THY GOD BLESSETH THEE…” was filed by Elvira Smith as an intent‑to‑use filing on September 17 2007, but it was abandoned on August 20 2008 after the applicant failed to respond to a non‑final office action, so the mark is not live or registered. The only goods listed are in International Class 025 and consist of a wide range of clothing and related baby items such as T‑shirts, sweaters, pajamas, belts, shoes, baby bottles and blankets. A similar name used on clothing would raise the closest record‑based concern, while use on unrelated products would be farther from the scope shown here. Because the registration never reached the Supplemental Register, there is no supplemental‑register sequence to note. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice on August 20 2008, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern for anyone planning to brand clothing with a comparable phrase.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.