Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for TELE-POSTAL CARRIER SERVICE INC. ALASKAHELENA HAWAII CHICAGO HOUSTON NEW YORK TOKYO, JAPAN MIAMI COMPUTER MALL LOS ANGELES, CA LOCAL RETAIL ZIP CODE COMMUNITY LOCAL RETAIL CODE COMMUNITY CONTACT US WE SHOP PACK SHIP PICK UP AND LOCAL DELIVERY SAME DAY DELIVERY! TAKE YOUR POSTAL OUT OF THE SKY AND PUT IT ON THE WIRE! COMPUTERIZED MALL ATLANTA GA LOCATED IN CITIES CARS OR PRIVATE VEHICLE DELIVERY SHOPPER? CALL US WE SHOP AND DELIVER LOCAL AND NATIONWIDE, serial 76695513, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
Trademark Status Report
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Serial 76695513 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: TELE-POSTAL CARRIER SERVICE INC.
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Jan 30, 2009
Registered Mar 15, 2011
The record shows that the mark “TELE‑POSTAL CARRIER SERVICE INC.” was registered on the Principal Register on March 15, 2011, but it was cancelled on November 12, 2021 because the owner failed to file a Section 8 declaration. The owner is TELE‑POSTAL CARRIER SERVICE INC., a corporation organized in Mississippi. The mark covers services in class 42, specifically the design and development of computer hardware and software to expedite the delivery of goods to a destination, and the design and development of computer networking hardware and software that connects businesses nationwide and worldwide for the same purpose. A similar name would raise the closest concern for services that involve software or hardware development for delivery logistics. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording; it is limited to the described services. No enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. The last significant event was the cancellation in 2021, and no further maintenance dates are listed. For someone considering a similar name, the cancelled status reduces the risk, but the earlier registration still signals that the owner once claimed rights to that wording in the delivery‑software field.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.