Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for SAMSUNG, serial 77018065, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
SAMSUNGSerial 77018065 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Class 037 -
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Oct 10, 2006
The record shows that the mark “SAMSUNG” is dead and was abandoned by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. after no Statement of Use or Extension Request was filed following the Notice of Allowance. The mark was registered on the Principal Register for a wide range of services, including building sealing, computer installation, construction management, various communication services such as cable television, cellular telephone, and satellite transmission, and scientific and technology services like architectural design and computer programming. A similar name would raise the closest concern in any of these service areas, especially where the goods or services overlap with the listed categories. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “Samsung.” The prosecution history shows a series of SOU extensions and eventual abandonment, but no enforcement actions are recorded. The last significant event was the abandonment notice on June 28, 2010. For someone considering a similar name, the history suggests a meaningful risk of conflict in the listed service areas.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.