Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for SAMSUNG, serial 77039953, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
SAMSUNGSerial 77039953 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Class 014 -
Class 037 -
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Nov 08, 2006
The record shows that the mark “SAMSUNG” is dead on the Principal Register, having been abandoned on June 28 2010 because the owner, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., never filed a Statement of Use or Extension Request after the Notice of Allowance. The abandoned filing covered a wide range of goods and services, including jewelry such as bracelets, rings, and watches (class 014), a broad array of construction and repair services (class 037), various communication services (class 038), and scientific and technology services (class 042). A similar name would raise the closest concern in those same areas, especially where the goods or services overlap with the listed jewelry or communication services. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “Samsung.” The prosecution history shows a standard intent‑to‑use application that was never completed, with no evidence of opposition, cancellation, or enforcement activity. The last meaningful event was the abandonment notice on June 28 2010. For anyone considering a similar name, the abandoned status means the mark is no longer enforceable, but the goods and services listed still represent a potential area of concern if the new use is closely related.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.