Status report

Get it in writing

The official USPTO status record for SAMSUNG, serial 77039965, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.

INSTANT DELIVERY

Trademark Status Report

$7.99

The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.

  • Current status with a plain-English verdict
  • Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
  • The mark as it appears on the federal record
  • Every prosecution event, filing to today
  • Source-cited with the exact retrieval date

Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.

Payments launch soon. Leave your email and we'll tell you when this report is available.

Searching stays free, no account, no caps.

Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
SAMSUNG
Serial 77039965 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused

Owner: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Class 014 -
Class 037 -
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Nov 08, 2006

The record shows that the mark “SAMSUNG” is dead and was abandoned by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. after the applicant failed to file a Statement of Use or an Extension Request following the Notice of Allowance. The mark was held on the Principal Register for a wide range of goods and services, including jewelry items such as bracelets, rings, and watches, as well as a broad array of construction, communication, and scientific‑technology services. A similar name would raise the closest concern in those same categories, especially jewelry and related accessories, because those goods are the most narrowly described in the record. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “Samsung.” No enforcement activity—oppositions, cancellations, or court actions—is visible in the supplied history. The last significant event was the abandonment notice on June 28, 2010. For anyone considering a similar name, the risk is that the abandoned mark still covers those specific goods and services, so using the name in those areas could create a meaningful concern.

Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.

The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.

Your name deserves a straight answer.

Search the federal register free. No account, no caps, no waiting around.

Run a free trademark search