Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ECOZONE PROJECT, serial 77065735, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ECOZONE PROJECTSerial 77065735 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: EcoMedia LLC
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Dec 15, 2006
The record shows that “ECOZONE PROJECT” is an abandoned service mark – the application was filed by EcoMedia LLC on Dec 15 2006, published for opposition in Jan 2009, issued a Notice of Allowance in Apr 2009, and then was abandoned on Nov 9 2009 because no Statement of Use was filed. The only goods and services listed are in International Class 041 and focus on entertainment‑type services such as publishing newspapers, magazines, brochures, guides and books, plus electronic newsletters, blogs, podcasts and internet shows that deal with environmental conservation, protection, education and making homes and businesses energy‑efficient. A similar name used for anything outside that environmental‑education and media niche would be farther from the scope shown here, but the record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Ecozone” or “Project.” Because the mark was on the Principal Register and never moved to the Supplemental Register, there is no supplemental‑register sequence to note. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice on Nov 9 2009, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan a comparable environmental‑education brand, but the risk is limited to the specific media‑focused services listed.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.