Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for WORDNETWORKS [], serial 77073519, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
WORDNETWORKS []Serial 77073519 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: WordNetworks Inc
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Dec 29, 2006
The record shows that WORDNETWORKS [] is an abandoned service mark owned by WordNetworks Inc, a Delaware corporation, and it is not currently live or registered; the latest status event was an abandonment notice mailed on November 21, 2007 after the applicant failed to respond to a non‑final office action. The application covered advertising and marketing services (class 035) and computer software development (class 042), both listed as “Advertising and marketing” and “Computer software development” with first use claimed on August 18, 2005 and use in commerce from February 1, 2006. Because the filing was abandoned, the record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the word “WORDNETWORKS,” but it does indicate a potential concern for anyone offering advertising, marketing or software development services under a similar name, since those are the exact areas the application sought protection for. The prosecution history shows a notice of a pseudo‑mark and a non‑final action before the abandonment, but no later enforcement actions appear in the file. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use a comparable name in the same advertising or software development fields.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.