Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for I PICKED A MAJOR I LIKE, AND ONE DAY I WILL PROBABLY BE LIVING IN A BOX, serial 77122184, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
I PICKED A MAJOR I LIKE, AND ONE DAY I WILL PROBABLY BE LIVING IN A BOXSerial 77122184 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Davidson, Lora Rachel
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 010 -
Class 014 -
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 021 -
Class 024 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 026 -
Class 028 -
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 040 -
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Mar 05, 2007
The record shows the application for “I PICKED A MAJOR I LIKE, AND ONE DAY I WILL PROBABLY BE LIVING IN A BOX” is dead – it was abandoned on Dec 11, 2007 after the applicant failed to respond to an Office action, and no later filings or renewals appear. The owner listed is Lora Rachel Davidson, an individual, and the filing was made on Mar 5, 2007 under an intent‑to‑use basis. The goods and services span many classes, most notably Class 009 (electronic media such as downloadable MP3 files, web‑casts, and computer‑disk jackets), Class 014 (shirt studs), Class 016 (books and printed matter related to college career counseling), and Class 025 (a wide range of shirts, jackets and other apparel). Because the mark never issued and was abandoned, the record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording, but a similar name used on electronic publications, online audio content, or apparel could encounter the closest record‑based concern in those listed categories. The prosecution history shows a non‑final Office action in May 2007 followed by an examiner’s amendment, but the application never progressed to registration. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations or court actions, so no enforcement signal is visible. I'd treat this as a modest concern if you plan to use the phrase for similar digital media or clothing, since the abandoned filing still appears in the USPTO database.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.