Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for POWER IN THE SHOWER, serial 77127159, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
POWER IN THE SHOWERSerial 77127159 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Galderma S.A.
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Class 005 - Pharmaceuticals
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Mar 09, 2007
The record shows that the mark “POWER IN THE SHOWER” is dead, having been abandoned because the applicant did not respond to an Office action. The owner listed is Galderma S.A., a Swiss société anonyme. The mark covered cosmetics and cleaning goods, specifically hair shampoo, and medicated hair shampoo, as well as services related to retail and wholesale of pharmaceutical and dermatological products and research and development in those fields. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the cosmetics and pharmaceutical hair‑shampoo area, especially where the product is marketed as a shampoo or a medicated shampoo. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording, only over the specific goods and services listed. The prosecution history shows a single non‑final action and an abandonment notice; no enforcement actions are recorded. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status reduces the risk, but the goods listed still present a meaningful concern if the new use overlaps those categories.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.