Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for VINTAGE VAVOOM, serial 77160509, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
VINTAGE VAVOOMSerial 77160509 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: YV Media LLC
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Apr 19, 2007
The record shows that “VINTAGE VAVOOM” is an abandoned application – the USPTO marked it dead after the owner, YV Media LLC, failed to file a required Statement of Use following the Notice of Allowance, with the abandonment notice dated February 2 2009. The filing covered Class 016 paper goods and printed matter and Class 041 education and entertainment, specifically magazines and an online magazine about home decoration and design that focus on vintage decorating elements and furnishings. A similar name used for any home‑decor publishing, whether print or digital, would fall into the closest area of concern because the goods and services are narrowly described around that niche. The record does not give YV Media LLC control over every possible use of the words “vintage” or “vavoom” in unrelated fields. No Supplemental Register entry appears, and the prosecution history simply moves from approval for publication to a Notice of Allowance and then abandonment, without any refusal or amendment. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice on February 2 2009, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a similar name for home‑decor magazines or online content, since the existing filing directly targets that market.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.