Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ELSA ES, serial 77223029, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ELSA ESSerial 77223029 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: INTERBASIC HOLDING S.R.L.
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 018 -
Class 020 -
Class 021 -
Class 022 -
Class 023 -
Class 024 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 026 -
Class 027 -
Class 028 -
Class 034 -
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Jul 05, 2007
Registered Dec 28, 2010
The record shows that “ELSA ES” is a cancelled Principal Register mark owned by INTERBASIC HOLDING S.R.L.; the cancellation was entered on August 4 2017 because the registrant failed to file a required Section 8 declaration. The registration covered a very broad set of goods—from perfumery, cosmetics and personal care items to spectacles, cellular phones, paper covers, non‑leather bags, furniture, household utensils, textiles, clothing, toys, tobacco accessories and a range of educational and entertainment services such as fashion‑related classes, seminars and radio‑TV production. If you plan to use a similar name on products or services that fall within any of those categories, the record presents the closest area of concern; it does not, however, give the owner control over every possible use of the words “ELSA ES.” The prosecution history shows an initial refusal, an amendment and eventual registration, but the mark never moved to the Supplemental Register. No oppositions, cancellations beyond the Section 8 filing, or court actions appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern for any venture targeting the same classes of goods or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.