Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for XCELL-CENTER, serial 77238547, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
XCELL-CENTERSerial 77238547 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: XCell-Center GmbH im Institut fur Regenerative Medizin
Class 039 -
Class 044 - Medical & Beauty Services
Filed Jul 25, 2007
Registered Feb 23, 2010
The record shows that the mark “XCELL‑CENTER” is no longer live; it was cancelled on September 30 2016 because the registrant failed to file a Section 8 declaration. The owner listed is XCell‑Center GmbH im Institut fur Regenerative Medizin, a German company. The mark covered two classes: class 039 for transport and storage of stem cells, tissue, organs, sperm and blood, and class 044 for stem cell banks, tissue banks, organ banks, sperm banks, blood banks, medical services, and stem cell therapies. A similar name would raise the closest concern in those specific areas of medical and biological services and logistics. The record does not give the mark control over every use of the wording; it is limited to the goods and services listed. The prosecution history shows a typical sequence of amendments and a suspension, but no special Supplemental Register status. The last significant event was the cancellation in 2016, and no enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the cancelled status reduces the risk, but the specific medical and transport services listed remain a potential point of concern.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.