Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for LILLY PAD, serial 77251304, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
LILLY PADSerial 77251304 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: The Lilly Pad Company, LLC
Class 020 -
Filed Aug 09, 2007
The record shows that “LILLY PAD” is an abandoned application, filed by The Lilly Pad Company, LLC, a Colorado limited‑liability company, and it never entered the register; the USPTO mailed an abandonment notice on June 12 2008 after the applicant failed to respond to a non‑final office action. The only goods listed are “Children’s car seat covers” in International Class 020, with a first use date of May 10 2007. Because the filing is limited to that specific product, a similar name used for anything else—say, toys, clothing, or software—would fall outside the narrow scope the record covers, though the wording itself is not cleared for all uses. The prosecution history shows the usual examination steps (design‑search code notice, non‑final action, attorney change) ending in abandonment, and there are no entries for oppositions, cancellations or court actions, so the supplied history shows no enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a modest concern if you plan a mark for child‑related seat accessories, but the risk drops sharply for unrelated goods or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.