Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PS4 PROXIMITY SENSITIVE SESSION SUPPORT SERVICES, serial 77259567, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PS4 PROXIMITY SENSITIVE SESSION SUPPORT SERVICESSerial 77259567 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Aug 20, 2007
Registered Dec 29, 2009
The record shows that the mark “PS4 PROXIMITY SENSITIVE SESSION SUPPORT SERVICES” was registered on the Principal Register on December 29, 2009 and was cancelled on August 5, 2016 because the registrant failed to file a Section 8 declaration. The owner listed is General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc., a corporation organized in Virginia. The mark covers scientific and technology services, specifically computer consultation, network design, and software design for managing remote wide‑area network systems, with a focus on monitoring and improving network reliability and interoperability. A similar name would raise the closest concern in this narrow field of computer‑network and software‑management services. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording; it is limited to the goods and services listed. The last meaningful event was the cancellation in 2016, and no enforcement actions such as oppositions or court proceedings appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the cancelled status reduces the risk, but the specific services listed remain a potential point of concern.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.