Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for INSIDEOUT, serial 77265138, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
INSIDEOUTSerial 77265138 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Soteria Holdings
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 044 - Medical & Beauty Services
Filed Aug 27, 2007
The record shows that the mark INSIDEOUT was filed by Soteria Holdings, a Florida limited‑liability company, on August 27 2007 but was abandoned on January 21 2009 after the applicant failed to respond to an Office action, so it is not a live or registered mark. The application covered services in class 041 – personal training, fitness consultation, fitness facilities, and medical training and teaching – and in class 044 – weight‑reduction diet planning, functional medical‑rehabilitation assessments, leasing of medical equipment, and other medical services. A similar name used for fitness, health‑care, or medical‑training services would encounter the closest record‑based concern because those are the exact areas the abandoned application sought to protect. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “insideout” in other unrelated fields. The prosecution history shows a series of non‑final actions and an amendment to the use filing before the abandonment notice, but no supplemental‑register filing appears. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice dated January 21 2009, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or court actions. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan to use a similar name for fitness or medical‑related services, but the mark is no longer enforceable.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.