Status report

Get it in writing

The official USPTO status record for WAGGIN' TAILZ, serial 77299207, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.

INSTANT DELIVERY

Trademark Status Report

$7.99

The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.

  • Current status with a plain-English verdict
  • Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
  • The mark as it appears on the federal record
  • Every prosecution event, filing to today
  • Source-cited with the exact retrieval date

Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.

Payments launch soon. Leave your email and we'll tell you when this report is available.

Searching stays free, no account, no caps.

Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
WAGGIN' TAILZ
Serial 77299207 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused

Owner: Good Gossip, LLC
Class 039 -
Class 044 - Medical & Beauty Services
Class 045 - Legal & Personal Services
Filed Oct 09, 2007

The record shows that “WAGGIN’ TAILZ” is a dead service mark owned by Good Gossip, LLC, a Texas limited liability company. The mark was abandoned on March 3, 2009 because the applicant did not respond to an Office action. The goods and services listed are pet‑related: pet taxi transport services (class 039), pet care services such as dog walking, medication administration, and pet bathing (class 044), and pet sitting or overnight house‑sitting (class 045). A similar name would raise the closest concern in those pet‑care and transportation areas, especially where the services are offered under a name that could be confused with “WAGGIN’ TAILZ.” The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording, only over the specific services listed. The prosecution history shows a final refusal and subsequent abandonment; no supplemental register status is involved. The last event was the abandonment notice in March 2009, and no enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the main risk lies in the pet‑care and transport services described, where the abandoned mark could still signal a prior claim.

Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.

The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.

Your name deserves a straight answer.

Search the federal register free. No account, no caps, no waiting around.

Run a free trademark search