Status report

Get it in writing

The official USPTO status record for FASHION IN THE SCHOOLS FITS, serial 77317117, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.

INSTANT DELIVERY

Trademark Status Report

$7.99

The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.

  • Current status with a plain-English verdict
  • Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
  • The mark as it appears on the federal record
  • Every prosecution event, filing to today
  • Source-cited with the exact retrieval date

Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.

Payments launch soon. Leave your email and we'll tell you when this report is available.

Searching stays free, no account, no caps.

Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FASHION IN THE SCHOOLS FITS
Serial 77317117 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled

Owner: MITCHELL, CARY C.
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Filed Oct 30, 2007
Registered Dec 16, 2008

The record shows that “FASHION IN THE SCHOOLS FITS” is a cancelled Principal Register registration (Reg. No. 3545999) owned by Cary C. Mitchell, an individual, and it was cancelled on July 17 2015 because the required Section 8 declaration was not filed. The registration covered only Class 016 paper goods and printed matter – things like adhesive note paper, advertising boards, art paper, blank postcards, paper notebooks and similar items – so a similar name used on those kinds of paper products would create the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the words “fashion,” “schools” or “fits” in other categories, and it does not appear on the Supplemental Register, so there is no supplemental‑register‑specific sequence to note. The latest meaningful event is the Section 8 cancellation in 2015, and no further dates are listed. The prosecution history shows no oppositions, cancellations by third parties, or court actions, so the supplied history shows no visible enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan to use the same phrase for paper‑based goods, but the risk is far lower for unrelated product lines.

Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.

The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.

Your name deserves a straight answer.

Search the federal register free. No account, no caps, no waiting around.

Run a free trademark search