Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for EMERALD RE, serial 77317699, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
EMERALD RESerial 77317699 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: SunCoast Holdings, Inc.
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Filed Oct 31, 2007
The record shows that the mark EMERALD RE is abandoned, with the last status dated September 16 2008, and the owner listed as SunCoast Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation. The application covered only class 036, specifically “insurance services; insurance company services; insurance products; full service insurance services,” so the closest area of concern would be any use of a similar name in the insurance or financial services field. The record does not give SunCoast Holdings control over every possible use of the words “emerald” or “re” in unrelated industries. Because the filing was on the Principal Register and never moved to the Supplemental Register, there is no supplemental‑register sequence to note. The most recent meaningful event is the abandonment notice mailed on September 16 2008, and no further maintenance or renewal dates appear. The prosecution history shows no oppositions, cancellations or court actions, so the supplied history shows no visible enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a modest concern if you plan to use a similar name for insurance‑related services, but the risk is far lower for other types of goods or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.