Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PASSION FOR YOUR WELL-BEING, serial 77329415, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PASSION FOR YOUR WELL-BEINGSerial 77329415 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Mercantil Servicios Financieros, C.A.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Class 038 - Communication Services
Filed Nov 14, 2007
The record shows the mark PASSION FOR YOUR WELL‑BEING is dead – it was abandoned on Feb 15 2010 because no Statement of Use was filed after the Notice of Allowance, and the owner listed is Mercantil Servicios Financieros, C.A. The filing covered a wide range of goods and services, including magnetic‑band cards (class 009), various paper and printed financial documents, greeting cards and filing supplies (class 016), advertising and online ad services (class 035), banking, credit‑card and insurance‑related financial services (class 036), and cable, radio, television and other telecommunications services (class 038). A similar name would raise the closest concern in any of those areas, especially financial‑service paperwork or electronic banking services, because the record’s protection is limited to those listed categories. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “passion,” “well‑being,” or similar phrasing in unrelated fields. There is no Supplemental Register entry, and the prosecution history simply moves from an examiner’s amendment to approval for publication and then to abandonment. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice on Feb 15 2010, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use a comparable name in financial, advertising or communications services, since the abandoned filing still signals that the owner once sought protection in those exact sectors.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.