Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for AFTON SCIENTIFIC, serial 77343253, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
AFTON SCIENTIFICSerial 77343253 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: AFTON SCIENTIFIC, LLC
Class 020 -
Class 040 -
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Dec 04, 2007
Registered Jan 27, 2009
The record shows a live, Principal Register registration (Reg. No. 3566660) owned by AFTON SCIENTIFIC, LLC, a Virginia limited‑liability company, and the mark “AFTON SCIENTIFIC” carries a disclaimer on the word “SCIENTIFIC.” It covers three classes: Class 020 for empty, sterile glass vials and related sterile kits used in pharmaceutical processing; Class 040 for custom manufacture, formulation, processing and filling of pharmaceuticals and biological preparations to customer specifications; and Class 042 for development of pharmaceutical preparations and medicines. A similar name would raise the closest record‑based concern if used in any of those pharmaceutical‑related contexts, because the listed goods and services focus on sterile containers, custom drug manufacturing and drug development. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “AFTON” or “SCIENTIFIC” outside those areas. The latest meaningful event is the February 25 2019 notice that the registration was renewed for its first ten‑year term; no future deadline appears in the data. The prosecution history contains no oppositions, cancellations or court actions, so the supplied history shows no visible enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use a comparable name in the pharmaceutical manufacturing or development space.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.