Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for HAPPY HATS, serial 77408974, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
HAPPY HATSSerial 77408974 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Happy Hats for Kids
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Filed Feb 28, 2008
The record shows that the mark “HAPPY HATS” is dead because the applicant, Happy Hats for Kids, a California corporation, failed to respond to an office action and the application was abandoned on January 9, 2009. The mark was filed on February 28, 2008 and was intended for use in commerce on February 1, 2008 for charitable fund‑raising services in class 036, which covers insurance and financial services. Because the mark was never registered, it does not give the owner control over every use of the wording; it only indicates that the owner once sought protection for that specific charitable‑fund‑raising context. The prosecution history shows a non‑final action in June 2008 and an abandonment notice in January 2009, with no subsequent maintenance or renewal events. No enforcement actions, oppositions, or cancellations appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the closest concern would be using “HAPPY HATS” for charitable fund‑raising or related financial services, while other unrelated uses may pose a lesser risk.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.