Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ECOZONE, serial 77437845, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ECOZONESerial 77437845 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Ecozone (UK) Limited
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Class 011 -
Class 021 -
Class 034 -
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Filed Apr 02, 2008
The record shows that “ECOZONE” is an abandoned application – the USPTO marked it dead after the applicant failed to respond to an Office action, with the abandonment notice mailed on August 24 2009. The owner listed is Ecozone (UK) Limited, a UK corporation that filed the intent‑to‑use application on April 2 2008. The goods and services span several classes, most notably Class 003 (washing, bleaching and other laundry‑related preparations), Class 011 (a magnetic lime‑scale inhibiting device for water supply), Class 021 (hand‑held laundry dispensers and foam sponge rings), and broader retail and wholesale services in Classes 034 and 035 covering cleaning, household tools, appliances and related retail activities. A similar name would raise the closest concern if used for laundry, cleaning or household‑goods products or services, because those are the areas the record specifically covers. The record does not give Ecozone control over every possible use of the word “Ecozone” outside those listed categories. No supplemental‑register filing appears, and the prosecution history simply reflects the non‑final Office action and the subsequent abandonment. The supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market laundry or cleaning products under a similar name, but the risk is limited to the scopes shown in the record.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.