Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for SPORTY DIVA, serial 77440775, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
SPORTY DIVASerial 77440775 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Coates, Rose
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Apr 04, 2008
Registered Nov 04, 2008
The record shows that SPORTY DIVA is a cancelled Principal Register service mark, with the cancellation entered on June 5 2015 because the registrant, Rose Coates, did not file a required Section 8 declaration; the mark is therefore not live. The registration covered Class 041 services – personal training (strength and conditioning), motivational speaking, workshops and mentoring in health‑and‑wellness education – all listed as “Personal training services, namely, strength and conditioning training; Educational and entertainment services, namely, providing motivational speaking services in the field of health and wellness; Education services, namely, providing workshops in the field of health and wellness; Education services, namely, mentoring in the field of health and wellness.” A similar name used for fitness‑related training, wellness talks or health workshops would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated fields would be farther from the scope shown. The prosecution history shows a normal filing, publication for opposition on August 19 2008, registration on November 4 2008, and the later Section 8 cancellation in 2015; no oppositions or other enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to offer comparable health‑and‑wellness services under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.