Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for KANYE WEST'S GLOW IN THE DARK, serial 77450050, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
KANYE WEST'S GLOW IN THE DARKSerial 77450050 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Mascotte Holdings, Inc.
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Filed Apr 16, 2008
The record shows that “KANYE WEST’S GLOW IN THE DARK” is an abandoned application – the USPTO marked it dead on Jan 14 2013 after no Statement of Use was filed following the Notice of Allowance, and no later renewal or extension appears. The owner listed is Mascotte Holdings, Inc., a California corporation, and the filing was based on an intent‑to‑use basis. The only goods covered are in International Class 016, a long list of paper‑based items such as posters, calendars, stickers, greeting cards, scrapbooks, stationery, binders and related accessories; a similar name would raise the closest record‑based concern for products that fall within that paper‑goods category. Because the application never issued a registration, the record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording in other markets or product types. The prosecution history shows the application cleared an initial examination, received a Notice of Allowance in Dec 2009, went through several extensions of time to file a Statement of Use, and then was abandoned for lack of that filing. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations or court actions, so no enforcement signal is visible. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan paper‑goods or printed‑matter under a similar name, but the risk is far lower for unrelated product categories.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.