Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for CARL ZEISS MEDITEC: LOOK CLOSER. SEE FARTHER., serial 77450502, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
CARL ZEISS MEDITEC: LOOK CLOSER. SEE FARTHER.Serial 77450502 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Carl Zeiss Meditec AG
Class 005 - Pharmaceuticals
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 010 -
Filed Apr 17, 2008
Registered Apr 13, 2010
The record shows a cancelled Principal Register registration (Reg. No. 3773938) for “CARL ZEISS MEDITEC: LOOK CLOSER. SEE FARTHER.” owned by Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, a German corporation; the cancellation was entered on Nov 18 2016 because the owner did not file an acceptable Section 8 declaration. The mark covered a range of ophthalmic and medical items—including eye patches, software for ophthalmology and surgical lasers, protective eyewear, contact lenses, intra‑ocular lenses, optical examination devices, corneal topographers, medical lasers and related accessories—so a similar name used for any of those products would create the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the wording, only over the listed goods and services. No Supplemental Register activity appears, and the prosecution history shows only standard examination steps and a final registration in 2010 before the later cancellation. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations by third parties, or other enforcement signals. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a name in the same ophthalmic‑medical field, but the risk is far lower for unrelated categories.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.