Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PETAL, serial 77466605, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PETALSerial 77466605 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Advanced Stent Technologies, Inc.
Class 010 -
Filed May 06, 2008
The record shows that the mark “PETAL” is dead and was abandoned by Advanced Stent Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation, because no Statement of Use or Extension Request was filed after the Notice of Allowance. The mark was registered on the Principal Register for class 010 goods, specifically medical devices for use in vascular and intravascular procedures such as stents, stent delivery systems, and catheters. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the same medical device field, especially for products that fall under class 010. The abandonment does not give anyone free rein to use the wording in any context; it only indicates that the owner no longer holds the registration. The prosecution history shows a series of extensions granted up to June 2011, after which the abandonment notice was mailed and the mark was declared dead. No oppositions, cancellations, or court actions appear in the supplied history, so there is no visible enforcement activity. For someone considering a similar name, the main risk is that the abandoned mark still represents a prior claim in the specific medical device area, and using the same name for similar products could create a potential conflict.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.