Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PIERGIRL, serial 77479009, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PIERGIRLSerial 77479009 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Colleen, Charles
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Filed May 20, 2008
Registered May 19, 2009
The record shows that the mark “PIERGIRL” was registered on the Principal Register on May 19 2009 but was cancelled on December 25 2015 because the owner, Colleen Charles, did not file a required declaration under Section 8. The mark covered mail‑order catalog services and online retail services for clothing, lingerie, footwear, headwear and fashion accessories in class 035. A similar name would raise the closest concern for businesses offering those same types of apparel and accessories, especially online or mail‑order sales. The cancellation means the owner no longer holds enforceable rights on the Principal Register, but the record does not prevent anyone from using the wording in unrelated goods or services. The prosecution history shows a normal sequence of publication, opposition, allowance, and registration, with no indication that the mark was ever moved to the Supplemental Register. The latest status event is the cancellation in 2015, and no enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the record suggests a meaningful risk only if the new use is in the same apparel and retail space.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.