Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for JUST BECAUSE FOR DOGS TREATS FOR THE SPECIAL DOGS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS, serial 77501520, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
JUST BECAUSE FOR DOGS TREATS FOR THE SPECIAL DOGS WITH SPECIAL NEEDSSerial 77501520 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Just Because...For Dogs LLC
Class 031 -
Filed Jun 18, 2008
The record shows the application for “JUST BECAUSE FOR DOGS TREATS FOR THE SPECIAL DOGS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS” is dead – it was abandoned on March 15 2010 because the owner never filed a required Statement of Use after the Notice of Allowance, and the record lists Just Because…For Dogs LLC, a New Jersey limited‑liability company, as the applicant. The registration, had it been issued, covered only “Dog treats” in International Class 031, so a similar name used for dog‑treat products would be the closest area of concern; the record does not extend to other goods, services, or unrelated industries. This mark was never placed on the Supplemental Register; the prosecution history simply reflects the standard intent‑to‑use process, an amendment, a series of extensions, and ultimately abandonment. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice dated March 15 2010, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan to market dog treats under a comparable name, because the abandoned filing still signals that the USPTO once linked that wording to dog‑treat goods.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.