Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ORGANIFLOW, serial 77508887, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ORGANIFLOWSerial 77508887 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Organiflow LLC
Class 044 - Medical & Beauty Services
Filed Jun 26, 2008
The record shows that ORGANIFLOW is an abandoned service mark; the application was filed by Organiflow LLC, a New York limited liability company, on June 26 2008 and was abandoned on May 9 2009 after the applicant failed to respond to an Office action. The only goods‑and‑services description listed is “Lawn and plant care in the nature of fertilization delivered through sprinklers and drip emitters” in International Class 044, so a similar name used for any kind of landscaping, irrigation or fertilization service would be the closest area of concern. The record does not give Organiflow LLC control over every possible use of the word “Organiflow” in unrelated fields. The prosecution history shows a series of non‑final actions in October 2008 and a notice of pseudo‑mark, but the application never progressed to registration. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice dated May 9 2009, and no enforcement actions appear in the file. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan a similar name in the same class of lawn‑care services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.