Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ECOTONER, serial 77512312, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ECOTONERSerial 77512312 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: The Sherwin-Williams Company
Class 002 -
Filed Jul 01, 2008
The record shows that ECOTONER is an abandoned application, not a live registration, and the owner listed is The Sherwin‑Williams Company, a corporation organized in Ohio. The filing covered only class 002, specifically “colorant dispersions for use in surface coating compositions,” so the closest area of concern would be any product that functions as a pigment or dye additive in paints, coatings or similar finishes. The record does not give Sherwin‑Williams control over every use of the word ECOTONER in unrelated markets, and it never reached the Supplemental Register; it remained on the Principal Register until it was abandoned. The most recent meaningful event was the abandonment notice mailed on March 22, 2010 after no Statement of Use was filed following the Notice of Allowance dated February 17, 2009. The supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or court actions. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan a coating‑related product with a similar name, because the abandoned filing still signals the owner’s interest in that niche.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.