Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for DRAKE GIRL, serial 77541702, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
DRAKE GIRLSerial 77541702 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: DRAKE INTERNATIONAL MODELING & PERFORMING ARTS, INC.
Class 014 -
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 024 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 028 -
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 044 - Medical & Beauty Services
Filed Aug 07, 2008
The record shows that “DRAKE GIRL” is an abandoned application (status dead) that was filed by Drake International Modeling & Performing Arts, Inc. and never made it to a live registration; the last meaningful event was an abandonment notice mailed on June 16 2011 after the applicant failed to respond to an Office action. The mark was applied for a very broad set of goods and services, including jewelry and imitation jewelry (class 014), paper‑goods and printed matter such as photograph albums (class 016), a wide range of textiles and bedding (class 024), clothing and accessories (class 025), many types of toys (class 028), educational and entertainment services (class 041), and beauty‑and‑medical‑related services (class 044). Because the filing never survived, the USPTO record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Drake” or “Girl,” but it does indicate a potential concern if you plan to use a similar name for jewelry, clothing, toys, education programs or beauty services, since those are the exact areas the application covered. The prosecution history shows a series of extensions and a statement‑of‑use filing before the final abandonment, but no indication of opposition or other enforcement activity appears in the file. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern for similar uses in the listed categories, though the mark is no longer active.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.