Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for VIVI, serial 77564645, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
VIVISerial 77564645 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Baumgarten's
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Class 008 -
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 021 -
Filed Sep 08, 2008
The record shows that the mark “VIVI” is dead, having been abandoned because the applicant, Baumgarten’s, a corporation organized in Georgia, failed to respond to an Office action. The abandoned application covered cosmetics and cleaning goods such as compacts containing make‑up, cotton swabs, pre‑moistened cosmetic tissues, and manicure and pedicure implements, as well as paper tissues for cosmetic use and various brushes and floss. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the cosmetics, cleaning, and paper goods areas, especially where the goods are used for personal care or makeup removal. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “VIVI.” The prosecution history shows a non‑final action in December 2008 followed by abandonment in July 2009, with no evidence of enforcement activity. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status suggests a lower risk, but the specific cosmetics and cleaning goods listed remain the most relevant area of concern.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.