Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ORSON HYDE, serial 77584133, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ORSON HYDESerial 77584133 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: ORSON HYDE FOUNDATION
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Oct 02, 2008
The record shows that the mark ORSON HYDE is dead – it was abandoned on Feb 5 2013 because the applicant failed to respond to a final refusal – and the listed owner is the Orson Hyde Foundation, a Utah corporation. The only goods and services covered are “educational services, namely, conducting, sponsoring, and organizing discussions and seminars in the field of religion, government affairs, historical events, public life, and emerging issues of Israel” in class 041, so a similar name used for anything in that educational‑seminar niche would create the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the words “Orson Hyde” in unrelated fields. Because the application was on the Principal Register and never moved to the Supplemental Register, there is no supplemental‑register sequence to note. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice mailed on Feb 5 2013, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan educational‑seminar services in the same subject area, but the risk drops sharply for other types of goods or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.