Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for FLUFFY, serial 77607615, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FLUFFYSerial 77607615 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Cygany, Inc.
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 028 -
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Nov 05, 2008
The record shows that the mark “FLUFFY” is dead; it was abandoned because the owner, Cygany, Inc., did not file a Statement of Use or Extension Request after the Notice of Allowance on August 23, 2011. The mark was filed on November 5, 2008 under an Intent‑to‑Use basis and was published for opposition on December 21, 2010. The goods and services listed include bags for collecting pet waste (class 016), various pet and plush toys, card and board games, video games, puzzles (class 028), and a broad range of entertainment services such as television, radio, film, animated programs, online computer games, and music streaming (class 041). A similar name would raise the closest concern in the pet‑toy, game, and entertainment categories, especially where plush or pet toys are involved. The record does not grant control over every use of the word “Fluffy.” No enforcement activity—oppositions, cancellations, or court actions—is visible in the supplied history. The last meaningful event was the abandonment on March 26, 2012. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status means the mark is no longer enforceable, but the specific goods and services listed still represent a potential area of concern if used in those categories.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.