Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for RANGE ROVER, serial 77613350, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
RANGE ROVERSerial 77613350 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: JAGUAR LAND ROVER LIMITED
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed Nov 13, 2008
Registered Jul 14, 2009
The record shows that the mark “RANGE ROVER” is live and registered on the Principal Register under serial 77613350, owned by JAGUAR LAND ROVER LIMITED, a private company incorporated in the United Kingdom. The registration was filed on November 13, 2008, published for opposition on April 28, 2009, and officially registered on July 14, 2009. The goods covered are electrical and scientific apparatus in class 009, specifically sunglasses, spectacles, spectacle frames, eye glass cases, mobile phones, batteries and battery chargers, antennas, cases for mobile phones, hands‑free kits for phones, wired and wireless headsets for phones, and flotation devices for protecting phones in water. A similar name would raise the closest concern in these specific product categories. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording; it is limited to the listed goods. No enforcement actions such as oppositions or cancellations appear in the supplied history. The latest status event is the renewal noted in the status sentence. For someone considering a similar name, the presence of this active registration in class 009 suggests a meaningful risk of conflict if the name is used for comparable products.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.