Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for VAROOM BALLOON VAROOM BALLOON VAROOM BALLOON VAROOM BALLOON, serial 77623284, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
VAROOM BALLOON VAROOM BALLOON VAROOM BALLOON VAROOM BALLOONSerial 77623284 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Garage Toys, LLC
Class 012 -
Filed Nov 29, 2008
The record shows that the application for “VAROOM BALLOON VAROOM BALLOON VAROOM BALLOON VAROOM BALLOON” is dead, having been abandoned on September 26, 2009 because the applicant failed to respond to an Office action, and the owner listed is Garage Toys, LLC, a limited liability company organized in Illinois. The only goods covered are bicycle bells, bicycle horns, and a specific bicycle‑wheel‑spoke apparatus that simulates a V‑twin motorcycle engine sound, all in International Class 12, with a first use date of December 31, 2006. Because the registration is limited to those narrow bicycle‑related items, a similar name used for anything outside that scope—such as toys, balloons, or apparel—would not fall within the closest record‑based concern, though the wording itself is not cleared for all uses. The prosecution history shows a non‑final action in February 2009 followed by an abandonment notice in September 2009, and no enforcement actions appear in the file. I'd treat this as a modest concern only if you plan to market bicycle‑related sound‑producing accessories under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.