Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for SAMSUNG, serial 77642638, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
SAMSUNGSerial 77642638 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: SAMSUNG C&T CORPORATION
Class 004 -
Class 005 - Pharmaceuticals
Class 017 -
Class 018 -
Class 020 -
Class 022 -
Class 028 -
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 039 -
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Jan 02, 2009
The record shows that the mark “SAMSUNG” was abandoned by Samsung C&T Corporation and is no longer live on the Principal Register. The abandoned application covered a wide range of goods, including industrial chemicals, pharmaceuticals, plastics, leather goods, sporting equipment, and various services such as advertising, business consulting, and travel agency services. Because the mark was never allowed, it does not give the owner control over every use of the word “SAMSUNG.” The prosecution history indicates that after a Notice of Allowance the applicant failed to file a Statement of Use, leading to abandonment on August 20, 2012. No opposition, cancellation, or court action appears in the supplied history, so there is no visible enforcement activity. For someone considering a similar name, the closest concern would arise in the same broad categories of industrial chemicals, pharmaceuticals, or related services, but the abandoned status means the owner’s claim is limited to the specific goods and services listed.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.