Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for DRAGONBALL, serial 77661021, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
DRAGONBALLSerial 77661021 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Kabushiki Kaisha Shueisha (Shueisha, Inc.)
Class 014 -
Class 018 -
Class 020 -
Class 021 -
Class 024 -
Class 029 - Meats & Processed Foods
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Filed Feb 02, 2009
The record shows that the “DRAGONBALL” application filed by Kabushiki Kaisha Shueisha (Shueisha, Inc.) is dead – it was abandoned on June 17 2013 because no Statement of Use was filed after the Notice of Allowance. The goods and services listed span a wide range of items, from fancy metal keyrings, jewelry and watches (class 014) to pet clothing, bags and wallets (class 018), various home‑goods like cushions and furniture (class 020), kitchen and personal‑care items (class 021), woven textiles (class 024), several food products such as milk, cheese and candy (classes 029 and 030). A similar name used on any of those categories would be the closest record‑based concern, but the record does not give Shueisha control over every possible use of the word “DRAGONBALL.” The prosecution history shows a series of extensions for filing a Statement of Use before the eventual abandonment, and no opposition or cancellation actions appear in the file. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market comparable goods under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.