Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for SANTEE COOPER HOME, serial 77666481, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
SANTEE COOPER HOMESerial 77666481 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: South Carolina Public Service Authority
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Class 037 -
Class 039 -
Class 040 -
Filed Feb 09, 2009
Registered Nov 09, 2010
The record shows that “SANTEE COOPER HOME” is a live Principal Register service mark owned by the South Carolina Public Service Authority, a state agency, and it has been renewed as of January 3 2020. The registration covers advertising and business services that promote energy‑efficient home building and retrofits, online cataloging of those programs, rebate offerings, and related hypertext links; it also includes financial services that provide temporary loans for energy‑efficient home improvements, as well as the transmission, distribution and generation of electricity for residential use. A similar name would raise the closest record‑based concern if used for any of those energy‑efficiency, loan or utility‑related services, because the listed goods are narrowly focused on that area. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Santee,” “Cooper” or “Home” in unrelated fields. No Supplemental Register activity appears, and the prosecution history shows a straightforward allowance and registration without descriptiveness refusals. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market energy‑efficiency or utility services under a comparable name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.