Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for IMA, serial 77680673, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
IMASerial 77680673 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: BioLucid Productions, Inc.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Feb 27, 2009
The record shows that the mark “IMA” is dead and was abandoned by BioLucid Productions, Inc., a corporation organized in Florida. The abandoned application covered computer software for displaying computer‑generated imagery of anatomical structures and physiologic events in the healthcare industry (class 009) and computer software development services for medical models (class 042). Because the mark was never allowed, the owner does not hold enforceable rights, but the record still indicates that a similar name could raise the closest concern for those specific software and medical‑modeling services. The prosecution history shows that the application was initially approved for publication, amended, and then allowed on the Principal Register before the owner failed to file a Statement of Use or Extension Request, leading to abandonment. No oppositions, cancellations, or court actions appear in the supplied history, so there is no visible enforcement activity. If you are thinking of using a similar name for software or medical‑modeling services, this abandoned record suggests a potential but not definitive risk.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.